Hello all, As per a recent conversation, I have generated a patch for the general entity file --- fedora-entities-en.xml. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=156771 There were a great many changes that I have made. Not all may be accepted into CVS; but I believe that these changes provide good value to the project. As you review the changes, please keep the following "open" issues in mind: - this file is incorrectly identified as xml. When in fact, it does not contain any XML markup at all. Just a thought. In keeping with standardization, it should be something like en.fedora.dbgenent.ent. But, thats just personal preference. ;) - if the "bluecurve" entity is accepted; does the <interfacedefinition/> element suffice as the parent node with its expected context? - if the "rpm" entity is accepted; what is its legal status? registered or trademark? - i neglected to utilize the common ISO entity declarations for readability. New authors find it difficult to read if utilized; yet translators probably need the ISO declarations. I prefer ISO --- but then again i am weird. ;) Hopefully, this will help. Thomas -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
