On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 17:09 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:50 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > > I'd like to recommend we dump the usage of CED files in favor of the > > local variables designation. The CED file is a pre-compiled DTD subset. > > For the record, this is a *complete reversal* of my previous position. > If Dave Pawson is lurking out there, he can laugh at me. The rest of > you who care can swift-kick when you see/meet me next. > > After working with the local variable, I am willing to undergo the pain > to change over to it. If there is even any pain. > > The only problem is _mixing_ the two formats. If I write using the > Local Variable and you load the CED file, our indenting will be off. At > the least, diffs will be noisy. OK. If we can agree on this then we can amend the documents that will be moving into CVS before they get there. I admit to total self-interest here: the IG has a fair number of files and will hopefully have multiple people updating it once it's in. -- Stuart Ellis stuart@xxxxxxxx GPG key fingerprint: 68B0 E291 FB19 C845 E60E 9569 292E E365 7098 ABEA
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
