On Wed, 2005-04-27 at 16:50 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote:
> I'd like to recommend we dump the usage of CED files in favor of the
> local variables designation. The CED file is a pre-compiled DTD subset.
For the record, this is a *complete reversal* of my previous position.
If Dave Pawson is lurking out there, he can laugh at me. The rest of
you who care can swift-kick when you see/meet me next.
After working with the local variable, I am willing to undergo the pain
to change over to it. If there is even any pain.
The only problem is _mixing_ the two formats. If I write using the
Local Variable and you load the CED file, our indenting will be off. At
the least, diffs will be noisy.
> <!-- Keep this comment at the end of the file
> Local variables:
> mode: xml
> xml-parent-document:("parent-file.xml" "book" "chapter")
> End:
D'oh!
that should be:
sgml-parent-document:("parent-file.xml" "book" "chapter")
I did s/sg/x/g without verifying. :)
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
Red Hat SELinux Guide
http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
