On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 08:17:42 -0400, "Paul W. Frields" <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Sorry if I held it up! :-( But it looks like we're back on schedule to > possibly have a decent release for FC4, thanks to Stuart's tireless > efforts. Well, I *was* tirelessly going in the wrong direction :), and really should have figured out much sooner that I was expecting the near impossible. So I'll happily take any brickbats... > Do you know who has the bootloader section? I think that may be one of the only things left. Mayank (Sharma) sent me an initial draft, and I'll ping him. > I was also thinking about whether it was worthwhile to change the name > of this publication from a "guide" to a "handbook," based on its current > mission to provide a lower level of instruction than the customary Red > Hat Guides. Is this nitpicking, or does anyone > else think there's value in differentiating between the two? Yes, I think that we should define what sort of document we want this project to produce (per separate thread on the FAQ, and not competing with other projects). IIRC, there's a bit of a precedent for Enterprise and Fedora using different terms to distinguish between the slightly different deliverables (bug fixes vs. errata). -- Stuart Ellis -- fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe: http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
