On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 07:25 -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 10:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > I seem to remember this, or a very similar, topic from last year, before > > FC2 was released, but I'm not sure where that ended up. I did a search > > on the archives and didn't find the conversation thread I remember. > > What I did find was a thread where a couple people agreed to pull in > > information from other FAQs to raise the signal-to-noise ratio on > > #fedora, but unfortunately, I don't think they actually completed any of > > this work. Maybe someone else will have better luck either with a > > search or with their own memory bank. > > Are you remembering this? > > http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2004-August/msg00139.html > > It is similar. In fact I *hadn't* remembered that part -- thanks for finding this! > A piece of text like that at the top of an FAQ would help users without > putting us at risk. > > One odd concern, what would we call a derived FAQ? Fedora FAQ is > accurate, but I don't want to create competition, per se. > > Another option is to write a standard blurb about how to search for > answers via Google and make sure that it helps steer people toward > fedorafaq.org without doing it implicitly. Since there's input from Mark Webbink, Esq., in the thread you found, perhaps we have the answers we need to move forward with this idea. -- Paul W. Frields, RHCE http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
