On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 10:48 -0400, Paul W. Frields wrote: > I seem to remember this, or a very similar, topic from last year, before > FC2 was released, but I'm not sure where that ended up. I did a search > on the archives and didn't find the conversation thread I remember. > What I did find was a thread where a couple people agreed to pull in > information from other FAQs to raise the signal-to-noise ratio on > #fedora, but unfortunately, I don't think they actually completed any of > this work. Maybe someone else will have better luck either with a > search or with their own memory bank. Are you remembering this? http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-docs-list/2004-August/msg00139.html It is similar. A piece of text like that at the top of an FAQ would help users without putting us at risk. One odd concern, what would we call a derived FAQ? Fedora FAQ is accurate, but I don't want to create competition, per se. Another option is to write a standard blurb about how to search for answers via Google and make sure that it helps steer people toward fedorafaq.org without doing it implicitly. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
