On Wed, 2005-03-30 at 11:13 +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 11:59:18AM +0200, Jos Vos wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 10:46:47AM +0100, Tim Waugh wrote: > > > > > However, aside from images, what other things would we need from an > > > XSL-FO processor? My thinking is that if "all" that's missing for us > > > in xmlroff is the images rewrite, it might be quite a nice project to > > > focus on. > > > > What about FOP (Java-based, from the Apache project)? Does that work > > with GCJ (I only tried it with Sun Java IIRC)? It is far from complete, > > but it more or less works. > > Other discussions on this list have talked about FOP, but I haven't > seen any conclusions yet. A quick update on this. Tommy Reynolds patched xmlto to use FOP as a target. Mark Johnson is using this along with the package from jpackage.org in some tests over the next few weeks. Hopefully this will give us a clearer picture of where FOP falls short. > Just pointing out that FOP is not the only other usable XSL-FO > processor out there. Thanks, and definitely everyone keep your eyes open for other possible solutions. No matter what, we need a fully functional open source XSL- FO processor solution ... - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41 Red Hat SELinux Guide http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/enterprise/RHEL-4-Manual/selinux-guide/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
