<quote who="Tim Waugh"> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:32:34PM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > >> I'm poking Tim for some input. > > The xmltex and passivetex applications are no longer supported > upstream. I think the new way is to use some sort of ConTeXt-based > parser, but don't know the details. > >> I don't fully understand the issues. IIRC, we were discussing using fop >> instead of the tex backend for pdf generation. Is one of our barriers >> that there is no fop package for Fedora? And we want it compiled with >> gcj? > > If we had a fop package for Fedora, and someone was willing to make > the necessary adjustments to xmlto, I feel sure that things would be > bound to improve. When do we start? > > Tim. > */ > -- > > fedora-docs-list@xxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe: > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-docs-list
