On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 06:32:34PM -0800, Karsten Wade wrote: > I'm poking Tim for some input. The xmltex and passivetex applications are no longer supported upstream. I think the new way is to use some sort of ConTeXt-based parser, but don't know the details. > I don't fully understand the issues. IIRC, we were discussing using fop > instead of the tex backend for pdf generation. Is one of our barriers > that there is no fop package for Fedora? And we want it compiled with > gcj? If we had a fop package for Fedora, and someone was willing to make the necessary adjustments to xmlto, I feel sure that things would be bound to improve. Tim. */
Attachment:
pgpEnQyardQMB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
