On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 17:38, Mark Johnson wrote:
> Brock Organ wrote:
> > On Wed, 2004-09-15 at 16:52 -0400, Tammy Fox wrote:
> >
> >>I was about to add the common draft notice file from bug #132415, but I
> >>wanted to discuss the wording of the notice a bit more. (This was
> >>discussed on the Hardening Doc Preview thread, but I am starting a new
> >>one with a more appropriate subject.)
> >>
> >
> >
> >>Thoughts?
> >
> >
> > sounds good to me ...
>
> Me, too. A nice improvement:)
>
> > Then, in the parent file, the entity &BUG-NUM; would a link to the
> > Bugzilla entry for that document.
>
> We may not want the &BUG-NUM; entity to show the full URL if it's
> one of those horrendously long, page-wrapping bugzilla URLs. If
> that's indeed the case, we may want the entity to contain a complete
> ulink element with link text that is literally the bugzilla bug
> number. ('just thinking out loud here...)
>
> Cheers,
> Mark
>
>
Sorry. That is what I was thinking but just didn't articulate properly.
The HTML version would have a link, but the text itself would just have
the bug number such as:
If you find any errors, please report them via Bugzilla in bug #11111.
Tammy
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> Mark Johnson <mjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> OS Product Documentation
> Engineering, Red Hat, Inc. <http://www.redhat.com>
> Tel: 919.754.4151 Fax: 919.754.3708
> GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120 568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242
>
