On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 06:07, Paul W. Frields wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-19 at 21:34, Karsten Wade wrote: > > * We don't want outside repositories or hosted draft documents to be > > seen _at_all_ as official, supported, backed-up, unrootkitted, or > > anything sources for FDP docs or SCM (software configuration > ^^^^^ other than? (not nitpicking, just making sure I > understand.) > > management). Bad idiomatic usage ... it should parse like, "we don't want outside repositories to be seen at all as official anything to do with FDP." Still awkward. How about: * Because of concerns over support, availability, redundancy, and security, we don't want non-FDP doc or source repositories to be seen as "officially" connected to the project. For example, if someone's SCM gets compromised and a rootkit trojan is loaded into document tarball ... well, bad things could happen. Hope that is clearer, - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer a lemon is just a melon in disguise http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
