Re: more defined process

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dave Pawson wrote:
On Sat, 2004-08-14 at 22:39, Mark Johnson wrote:


What problem does it solve?

Setting up emacsp/sgml, effectively, w/o having to do any setup.

Except add to a 'standard' emacs+psgml setup?

Well, yeah. If one has a bunch of psgml configurations, they do tend to pile up and often act funny as a result.


What of people who already are balancing ten different emacs 'standard'
configurations?

Then they're not newbies and probably wouldn't benefit from adopting psgmlx.


Any conditional sections btw, doesn't matter if they are internal or
external schema, its still a docbook extension.

Right, which would *require* us to use a modified FPI and a different system identifier, all of which would unnecessarily complicate things.


Cheers,
Mark
--
----------------------------------------------------------
Mark Johnson                     <mjohnson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat Documentation Group      <http://www.redhat.com>
Tel: 919.754.4151                Fax: 919.754.3708
GPG fp: DBEA FA3C C46A 70B5 F120  568B 89D5 4F61 C07D E242



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Red Hat 9]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux