On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 06:51, Colin Charles wrote: > On Thu, 2004-08-12 at 23:35, Paul W. Frields wrote: > > > > Can we use this, along with the anaconda docs? > > http://www.coolgoose.com/sites/lal_tvm/anaconda.html > > > Looks like it requires some DocBook-ifying, but yeah, it might be > > > useful > > > > Sure. Questions you need to answer first: > > <snipped> > > These are questions down to the original author, thanks. I just forward > interesting bits that could be possible docs (if you've been noticing > lately) - since I read all the lists, I might as well assign bits and > pieces that seem useful to different parts of the project Yes, this is a good example of an idea or existing document without an author. I'm thinking that perhaps the process should be, when an idea has enough weight to make a bugzilla report, make it one, and have it block the master tracker. In many ways, bugzilla has a manual workflow, comment tracking, and other features to make it a usable CMS (content management system). So, I filed 129782 for this Anaconda customization doc. It's OK if we file 100 and drop 70 of them into the bit-bucket, it's a better tracking and dropping mechanism than the mailing list. :) I set it to block 129722 for now, although that bug is nominally for finished, ready to post docs. I'm wondering, should we have a separate tracker bug that is just for "docs moving from idea to ready-to-publish"? Oh, wait, I decided to do that. So, 129784 is now a bucket for catching docs with authors but not ready for CVS and ideas without authors or needing conversion. 129782 is now only tracked by 129784. - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer a lemon is just a melon in disguise http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
