On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 00:18, Dave Pawson wrote: > On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 03:52, Karsten Wade wrote: > > > > http://people.redhat.com/kwade/fedora-docs/process-docs/writing_lifecycle.txt > > Comment. I'm nervous about the number of 'titles' around? (Roles) These aren't empty titles, they are roles to be fulfilled in a process. Not intended to add bureaucracy, just layers to get stuff done and make sure it is of a consistent quality. > Agree the jobs need doing; > Some 'titles' aren't mentioned again? (package maintainer) Somewhere toward the end I mention that we may want to have a fedora-docs RPM that goes in Core, Extras, etc., which contains a snapshot of documentation for the related version of FC. That package would need a maintainer, in addition to having a process to decide what goes into the package. > Specifics: > Invalid use for emacs. > If you want your xml tidying up say so. > XSLT can indent nicely with no content change. (identity transform, > output set to indent=yes. I'll disagree about that being a valid use of Emacs, but whatever. ;-) You can't blindly indent the document and walk away. If you anything in a <screen> or <programlisting> block that requires specific formatting (white space, etc.) -- such as code from a program, example from a config file, or a series of command line examples -- doing a DTD based indent will likely mess up those sections. If that is not true, I'd be very happy to see a demonstration. Otherwise, I will continue to manually C-c C-q my XML in Emacs. > Generally agree though. > > Want it marking up? Not a problem to do it myself, just wanted to get it more set in sandstone before going over from plain text. :) - Karsten -- Karsten Wade, RHCE, Tech Writer a lemon is just a melon in disguise http://people.redhat.com/kwade/ gpg fingerprint: 2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115 5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41
