On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 20:27, Karsten Wade wrote: > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 10:53, Dave Pawson wrote: > > On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 12:46, redwire@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > FC1 and FC2 have been in production since APRIL, it seems important to ME > > > at least that there be some sort of documentation made avail. Also, I > > > think that releasing some documentation would help alleviate some of the > > > errant posting of questions to the fedora-docs mailing list. > > > > > > The other alt. is to consider a FC docs based website, on my server, and > > > ask for any interested doc mailing list participants to send their docs to > > > me and I'll post them. > > > > I was thinking, kind offer etc, until I read Karstens mail, which I > > believe to be from within Redhat. > > Sorry, can you elaborate? I'm positive I stated my own opinions > clearly, and not that of Red Hat or anyone else involved in Fedora. I > don't understand what you mean here. > > > If RH are saying they don't care about documentation, lets put the work > > in somewhere else? At least until RH realise its important. > > Did someone say this? Where and when specifically, please? I'm happy > to help apply cluestick. <quote>Tue, 03 Aug 2004 10:35:19 -0700, your good self This is just speaking for myself, not Red Hat, but I don't think there is any specific work being done outside this project (read: this mailing list) on a process as you describe - taking a document from idea through to publication. What you see in the Documentation Guide, on &FDP-URL[1];, and on this mailing list is it, afaik. </unquote> To me that implies, as you said, if we don't do it, it won't get done? -- Regards DaveP. XSLT&Docbook FAQ http://www.dpawson.co.uk/xsl
