On 01/27/2011 08:33 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
389-ds-base will be going into
RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot put it in EPEL6
because it would conflict. We are interested in
suggestions about how to provide binary packages on
EL6.
pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?
389-ds-base in RHEL6.
And I assume that's in the Directory Server channel because
on my RHEL6 machine no 389-ds-base package exists and I do not
have a subscription to Redhat Directory service. Again
working on my assumption that means that RH directory service
is using the same package name as 389ds which would create the
conflict. So either 389-ds packages are renamed or cannot go
in EPEL, now its making sense.
389-ds-base is not _yet_ in RHEL6. Will be there in 6.1 or 6.2.
So is there some obstacle for the 389ds project to host its
own yum repo?
Other than being a PITA? But if that is the only way . . .
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
|
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
