2010/8/3 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
All servers are upgraded to 1.2.5 version, under CentOS 5.5 x86 (32 bit). Which is that bug? Is it in Bugzilla?
Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
>
> 2010/8/2 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>>
We also recently fixed a bug with the cache size calculation. What>
> Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I am trying to tune the performance of the Directory Server. We have
> > increased the memory for the database cache and for each database
> > entry cache. These are the new values:
> >
> > cn=config, cn=ldbm database, cn=plugins, cn=config
> > nsslapd-dbcachesize: 838860800 (~800MB)
> >
> > cn=*,cn=ldbm database, cn=plugins, cn=config
> > nsslapd-cachememsize: 125829120 (~120MB)
> >
> > We have 27 databases, and the servers have 16 GB of RAM, so the
> server
> > should be able to handle all that memory (800 + 120*27 =
> 4040MB). But
> > when I go to the monitoring section of the management console, the
> > database cache says the hit ratio is 99% (this is OK according
> to the
> > documentation, near 100%), but the entry cache is 0%, that is
> very far
> > for 100% that the documentation recomends (see screenshots
> attached).
> > Am I confused or the configuration is not correct?
> When you start out with an empty cache, the cache hit ratio will be 0
> until entries get into the cache and are pulled from the cache rather
> than the database.
>
> Try doing a search like ldapsearch ... -b "basesuffixofdatabase"
> "objectclass=*"
> >
>
>
> Well, the servers are running for a long time, not only a days. I have
> done that search, but the "Entry cache hit ratio" remains 0. I have
> also noticed that "Current entry cache size (in entries)" is only
> 4168, even after the search, although out directory cointains about
> 50000 entries. Is this normal?
platform? What 389-ds-base version? 32-bit or 64-bit?
>
All servers are upgraded to 1.2.5 version, under CentOS 5.5 x86 (32 bit). Which is that bug? Is it in Bugzilla?
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
