Regards.
El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:50, Juan Asensio Sánchez <okelet@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
These are the messages when enabling replication logs:
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Replica in use locking_purl=conn=207283 id=3
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 replica="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Unable to acquire replica: error: replica busy locked by conn=207283 id=3 for incremental update
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:51 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=11 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest: response=1 rc=0
[08/Mar/2010:16:02:54 +0100] NSMMReplicationPlugin - conn=221525 op=13 repl="o=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX,dc=XXXXX": Begin incremental protocol
These are all the messages in the access.log referring the connection conn=207283
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 fd=607 slot=607 SSL connection from XXXXXX to XXXXXX
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 SSL 256-bit AES
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Replication Manager,cn=config" method=128 version=3
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=replication manager,cn=config"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 SRCH base="" scope=0 filter="(objectClass=*)" attrs="supportedControl supportedExtension"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=2 RESULT err=0 tag=101 nentries=1 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 EXT oid="2.16.840.1.113730.3.5.3" name="Netscape Replication Start Session"
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=3 RESULT err=0 tag=120 nentries=0 etime=0
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX"
And no more... As you can see, the replica is busy since 8:16 (now is 16:51, in Spain). I am locked :S.El 8 de marzo de 2010 16:44, Juan Asensio Sánchez <okelet@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
At first sight, there are no messages neither in access or error logs, in supplier or consumers. Last modification operation in the busy replica/database is:
[08/Mar/2010:08:16:01 +0100] conn=207283 op=4 DEL dn="nsuniqueid=f851c101-1dd111b2-a64db547-e4060000+uid=cabudenhos029p$,ou=computers,o=XXXXXX,dc=XXXXXX,dc=XXX"
which does not get any RESULT operation. I have just enabled replication logs in the consumer to see any messages. As soon i get them, i will post.
Regards.2010/3/8 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>
Any thing in the errors log of the suppliers or the consumers?Juan Asensio Sánchez wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have posted this on the chat, but i am not sure if it is wirking
> fine in my computer. I am using 389ds 1.2.5, and i have found some
> replication conflicts (nsds5replicaconflict=*). I have deleted them
> manually, and now the databases in the other servers are busy all the
> time, no matter if i restart the service in the source or target
> servers (i must kill the target servers as they never stop), when the
> replication agreement is launched again from the source server, the
> replica is busy all the time. the last operation in the access log of
> the replicated servers is the deletion of the object in conflict,
> which never gets a result.
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> any idea?
>
> As other times, thanks in advance for your help.
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
