Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different "ou"?
> I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set of OUs
> can i still have chaining between master and slave?
>
Yes.
>
> Cheers,
> Ankur
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Ströder /<
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
>
>
> From: Michael Ströder <
michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
> To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
>
project." <
fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM
>
> Ankur Agarwal wrote:
> >
> > I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always being
> done to
> > the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to read some
> data
> > immediately after write, and my read request goes to the slave.
> It fails
> > in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to slave before
> > this read
operation.
>
> You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you have to
> rely on the
> consistency of what you recently wrote to the master.
>
> > Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation?
> > Can chaining help in this case?
>
> No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing client to
> the master
> which you don't want I guess).
>
> Ciao, Michael.
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx> <
http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
>
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users>
