Ankur Agarwal wrote:
Can i use chaining between master-slave without having different "ou"? I mean if i have exactly same directory structure and same set of OUs can i still have chaining between master and slave?
Yes.
Cheers,
Ankur
--- On *Thu, 10/8/09, Michael Ströder /<michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>/* wrote:
From: Michael Ströder <michael@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [389-users] Read data immediately after write
To: "General discussion list for the 389 Directory server
project." <fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thursday, October 8, 2009, 1:38 AM
Ankur Agarwal wrote:
>
> I have a master-slave set-up with write operations always being
done to
> the master node. Now there is an issue where i need to read some
data
> immediately after write, and my read request goes to the slave.
It fails
> in cases when replication hasnt happened from master to slave before
> this read operation.
You simply should not do that. Read from the master if you have to
rely on the
consistency of what you recently wrote to the master.
> Is there a LDAP level configuration to handle this situation?
> Can chaining help in this case?
No. (Except chaining the read requests of the writing client to
the master
which you don't want I guess).
Ciao, Michael.
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
<http://us.mc589.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=389-users@xxxxxxxxxx>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
<<attachment: smime.p7s>>
-- 389 users mailing list 389-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
