[389-users] Single Master, Multiple Slave with NO Configuration Server Question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi everyone,  I posted this last week but nobody replied.  I thought I would send it out there one more time as I'd really like to know what you experts think.  The documentation about what benefits using a configuration server gives you is lacking.

Just wondering if there are any problems I should be aware of if I want to setup a single master multiple slave scenario WITHOUT using the master as a configuration server and just replicating our directory database (not o=Netscape Root).  I'm ok having to connect to the slave admin servers individually instead of them all showing up in the console when I connect to the master admin server.  Are there any other drawbacks? 

What are the benefits of using a configuration server in this scenario?

Thank you,
-- 

Vince                   |  Michael Smith Laboratories
IT Systems Coordinator  |  University of British Columbia
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux