Re: [389-users] Registering to a central admin server

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Fri, Jun 19, 2009 at 8:51 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Chris Phillips wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
   Chris Phillips wrote:

       Hi,

       Can someone describe how to register an existing dirsrv
       instance to an existing admin server? The ds-setup-admin.pl
       scripts clearly performs the registration exercise along with
       the build, but I can't see how to do this as a single, 100%
       safe non-destructive way of registering existing machines to a
       central admin server, to avoid having to annoyingly connect to
       admin instances on evey existing machine as we currently have to.

   You should be able to use register-ds-admin.pl, or use
   setup-ds-admin.pl -u to update software/version information in the
   console.


Hi again,

I've been trying to do this, but I can't see how to register with a different centralized server. at no point in the register-ds-admin.pl steps can I give an alternative server name / IP address to go off and connect to. Any tips?
Try editing /etc/dirsrv/admin-serv/adm.conf to point to the correct server, then try register-ds-admin.pl

I'm afraid I'm still in the dark here. The adm.conf is used by the admin server to contact the DS instance to be managed? I thought the logic was the other way round, with the DS server "phoning home" to register itself to the Admin. Either way, the adm.conf then only lists one server in the ldapurl, and the other two attributes referencing the server, sie and isie both get changed to match the server in the ldapurl as part of the registration, removing all other references to the server that was in there. So whilst I thought my modifications to adm.conf (changing the ldapurl from server b to a) on server b and running register-ds-admin.pl on server b would add server b to the admin console on server a. Instead it *replaced* server b with server a on the admin console on server b, meaning both admin consoles were then registered to administer server a. Not anything like what I wanted!

Any pointers?

Cheers

Chris

--
389 users mailing list
389-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux