-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 satish patel wrote: > dear all > > it is possible to implement samba as PDC + FDS and it will give fully functionality like Win 2003 DC ?? I think its not fair when you compare a different product like win 2003 DC and FDS+samba. If you want fully functional LDAP feature as win 2003 DC....just buy it.... You may compare "OpenLDAP" with "FDS" for example. Fyi, i'm also using FDS+samba as: 1. Mail authentication (+postfix n dovecot) 2. Domain user authentication (PDC and BDC) 3. Application (developed by my team) authentication 4. Online Address book 5. Main authentication on file servers (samba+ACL) So thats all i need, at least for now.... Its depends on your need, why we buy bulky feature when we don't exactly need them. If you just want detail comparation of both feature, you may find them on the net, the are plenty docs there... Regard sigid -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFHMCy+qiPNNgPlDu0RAn3SAJ42ecGuztVwyNEqiKR44tVhvHeKawCfQkic zgYNmlG8fJyr8ocn4Mg7HQk= =8TGO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
