> It's possible that can happen as well. When this happens, usually changes are > propagated to the consumer through the master anyway, since that master is receiving > updates from the other master(s). I wonder if it is because we had a network blip between sites and there was an update/lock at the time so when the network came back up and the master tried to send updates, there was already a stale lock? It's actually multi-master replication - there are two masters and it's one of the masters which did this. > Did the replication monitor documentation help at all? The documentation on the repl-monitor script wasn't detailed enough perhaps? I tried getting this to work but couldn't. I tried every setting in the config file I could to no avail. It seems to be hard-coded to port 389 and I am running SSL (well, TLS). In any case, I really need something like SNMP alerts when there are replication problems. I suppose I can look for the string "NSMMReplicationPlugin" in the error log ... PK -- Fedora-directory-users mailing list Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
