Re: Available Revisions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Chen Shaopeng wrote:

Rich Megginson wrote:
Scott Boggs wrote:

I have just started using the Fedora-DS.  I have to say that I am very
impressed.  I currently am turning my attention towards working with
the server on a SE Linux platform.  However, I was wondering if it is
best to keep with the current static version that is provided via the
source download site, or could I get the latest and greatest to see
how in integrates.
We will be releasing a new binary version very soon.


Could you tell what will be in the new build? and a date?
We will be making an official announcement within the week, but the new build will have MD5, SHA-256, SHA-384, SHA-512 password support. It will also contain lots of bug fixes, many of which are in the windows sync component.

It would be cool if the build process could be cleanly separated.
For example, it should be easy to build the directory server
alone, and build the admin and console alone.
The build right now builds the directory server alone, and you can build the console alone as well. See the http://directory.fedora.redhat.com/Building for more information.

That would be easier for other people to participate too.
It's not too scary that way, coz the whole thing is pretty
big.

rgds

csp

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Users]     [Fedora Directory Devel]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Share Photos]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Watch]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux