As I understand it, replicated schema is stored in the 99user.ldif file
on each consumer.
Does anyone know if schema defined in 60x.ldif through 98x.ldif files on
the master is replicated to consumers? Or will masters only replicate
the schema that is present in their local 99user.ldif file?
In other words, will schema changes made to "60custom.ldif" on the
master be replicated to each consumer's 99user.ldif file, or will each
consumer's /<serverroot>/config/schema directory need to get an updated
copy of 60custom.ldif ?
- George
Jeff Clowser wrote:
Brian K. Jones wrote:
On Monday 20 June 2005 2:03 pm, Mike Jackson wrote:
Don't put schema into 99user.ldif, it's not maintainable.
This would seem to be contrary to the documentation on redhat's site.
I'm certainly not meaning to say you're wrong - quite the contrary -
I'm pointing out to whomever it may concern that the docs need
polishing :)
Keep in mind that you can edit schema using the console if the schema
you are editing is in 99user.ldif. If you put it in any other file,
the console will see it as read-only.
As a "good" practice, I'd say if you are testing or have schema that
changes often (for whatever reason), use 99user.ldif, but once you
have a stable schema, put it in a separate file for maintainability.
If you are rolling out multiple apps with custom schema in each, it
would probably be userful to put separate apps customizations in
separate files (i.e. 98mail.ldif, 98cal.ldif, etc). Just makes it
easier to keep things straight.
- Jeff
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
--
Fedora-directory-users mailing list
Fedora-directory-users@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
