Dan Nicholson (dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx) said: > > Further testing with this is giving me some bizarre errors and hangs > > relating to VT switching that don't happen with this patchset backed > > out. Unless I can track those down, I can't really recommend using > > it. > > Without doing anything from event.d, there's nothing on tty1 for the > `telinit 5' from runlevel 3 case, right? I don't want you to use a > broken patch, but I do think the current behavior is wrong. It's 'wrong', but it's predictably wrong without side-effects on the rest of the interface (crash, hang, etc.) and easily explained what to do. At this stage of the release cycle, that's better than a patch that fixes it for some cases and does really bizarre things in ways that I haven't characterized yet. (I've seen hangs in the VT switch code, and I can reliably reproduce a condition where the console is perfectly fine... but not actually updating on the screen.) Still poking at it, though. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
