Dan Nicholson (dbn.lists@xxxxxxxxx) said: > It is certainly getting complex, but the current setup is not robust. > Even if you take away the "I always want getty on tty1" pref, how do > you handle the case when the display manager is not gdm? Just have > nothing running on tty1? Because, init currently will not start a > getty on tty1 in runlevel 5 in any situation. > > > There's still the issue of what to do with respect to stopping sometihng > > on a current tty that GDM is using, if there is something there. > > You mean the `telinit 3' from runlevel 5 case? I'm not following exactly. Further testing with this is giving me some bizarre errors and hangs relating to VT switching that don't happen with this patchset backed out. Unless I can track those down, I can't really recommend using it. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
