Le lundi 10 novembre 2008 à 17:13 -0600, Les Mikesell a écrit : > I'm not sure I understand the logic of making upstream deal with the > problem that RPM's design introduces. There's rarely an issue if you > want to do parallel version installs out of an upstream source - and I'd > guess the developers _always_ do that for anything they rely on. Developpers typically re-create configuration files and data files when they do parallel installs. Thus they do not have to deal with config/data format conversion and rollback. Which is the main problem in doing rpm rollbacks, because unlike on dev stations, we can not afford to lose of duplicate user data. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
