On Sun, Nov 09, 2008 at 01:49:45PM -0600, Chris Adams wrote: > Would it make sense for libflashsupport to "Require: libcurl.so.4" then? > It is a hack, but libflashsupport in general is a hack, so it would seem > to be the best place for this (since the flash-plugin RPM itself is not > requiring the needed dependencies). In that case you may want to add libz.so.1 too, as I also needed to install zlib.i386 IIRC. But in that case you still have to know that you have to install libflashsupport.i386 ;-). I am used to built my own flash RPM for internal use, so I already added this to my spec file. -- -- Jos Vos <jos@xxxxxx> -- X/OS Experts in Open Systems BV | Phone: +31 20 6938364 -- Amsterdam, The Netherlands | Fax: +31 20 6948204 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
