Re: Flash 10 in 64-bit F9: does it work?

[Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chris Adams wrote:

Would it make sense for libflashsupport to "Require: libcurl.so.4" then?
It is a hack, but libflashsupport in general is a hack, so it would seem
to be the best place for this (since the flash-plugin RPM itself is not
requiring the needed dependencies).

  

Flash 10 no longer needs libflashsupport. In fact, the Flash 10 RPM already has a Require: libcurl.so.4. You couldn't install it without it. Fedora updated the libcurl RPM to have a libcurl.so.4. This was discussed back in the Fedora 10 beta when it was first changed.

If you somehow didn't have curl already installed... I question how you installed Flash in the first place. It definitely wasn't by RPM or else you added a --nodeps to your install arguments.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list