Le mardi 04 novembre 2008 à 08:58 -0500, Bill Nottingham a écrit : > Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx) said: > > > That's solving a different problem the wrong way, which certainly > > > seems better suited to a bit in the review request, or packagedb, etc. > > > > The target is to automate review requests as much as possible not pile > > up new manual checks. I don't ask this just for fun. I ask this because > > I happen to do comps QA for my SIG every few months and manual checks > > are not fun at all. > > How is packagedb or bugzilla not automatable? We have programmatic interfaces > to both. How the hell is software going to guess some stuff is not in comps because we intend it not to be in comps as opposed to stuff not being in comps because someone forgot to put it there? -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
