On Mon, 3 Nov 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote:
It might make sense -- it depends on what the context is that they're
doing it in. If I'm looking to play a certain type of game on my
installed box, yeah, I can maybe see that making sense.
But if instead I'm looking to install a system, I'm not as sure that it
does.
Something like this:
http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/search-browse-mockup.html
And I do think that you want to have the same sort of
groupings/taggings/whatever for both cases... that or we switch to a "we
always install a large base set of stuff and then you can go in and
tweak to your heart's content".
Which is like livecd-based-install + gui-installer later, right?
But that suggestion tends to make server-type people come after me with pitchforks and fire ;-)
My perspective on server-type installs has always been the same:
kickstart a minimal and %post the rest in via: yum -y install pkg1 pkg2
pkg3. But it might just be the years of success deploying like in that way
which makes me think that ;)
-sv
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
