Dax Kelson <dkelson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 8:12:45 am 11/01/08 Steve Grubb <sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: [...] > > The file system capabilities inside the kernel are treated as if they > > were suid apps. IOW, nosuid also disables file system capabilities. > That's too bad. Seems like that would be an elegant solution. No aid or rpm > verify complaints since the filesystem itself isn't modified and > compatibility with both types of kernels. Maybe worth separating suid and > file system capabilities within the kernel in regards to the "nosuid" mount > option. It wouldn't be the first time Fedora (and before that, Red Hat Linux) requires a kernel with specific configuration options. If you compile your own kernel, you _are_ on your own... As long as it isn't a Fedora-only patch to the kernel, it is OK with me (yes, I used to run self-compiled kernels most of the time [Got caught by other stuff lately]). -- Dr. Horst H. von Brand User #22616 counter.li.org Departamento de Informatica Fono: +56 32 2654431 Universidad Tecnica Federico Santa Maria +56 32 2654239 Casilla 110-V, Valparaiso, Chile 2340000 Fax: +56 32 2797513 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
