Steve Grubb (sgrubb@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > > That's the same way SELinux contexts are stored, right (so anything that > > handles extended attributes for SELinux should handle this as well)? > > Yes, that is the theory. I haven't personally done it, but if that doesn't > work we need a bz filed. Which also implies that network FS support is the same pit of despair that it is for SELinux labels? Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list