Casey Dahlin wrote:
I don't really agree with your expectations of Linux as a whole.
This idea has come about that there is an operating system called Linux
and there are many flavors of it called distros. This is not, IMHO, the
case. There are many different operating systems, and they all happen to
use the Linux kernel.
Maybe you don't remember it, but there was a time when there actually
were a lot of different operating systems in use, and they had really
annoying arbitrary differences. Fortunately most of them died and the
ones that continued converged on some standards. Different Linux
distributions are not different operating systems and they certainly
can't claim to be that and at the same time have a mantra of 'upstream'.
If somehow I could be transported 30 years into the future, and I could
be sat down in front of Fedora, I'd be honestly disappointed if I
recognized it.
You are imagining the wrong scenario. I'd like to avoid having to deal
with all of the silly and meaningless changes that break things for the
next 30 years too, but that's not going to happen. The real world
situation is that people have large and complex systems built around
existing OS behavior whether formally standardized or just inherited
from SysV that will break with program interface and device name
changes, and there are large numbers of people to retrain for every user
interface change. Now, plan your next 30 years in the context of
keeping things working through them instead of being magically
transported past everything that breaks. If you need to imagine
something, imagine that your bank and credit card accounts are
maintained on the OS you design and that the customer service people you
call are trying to guess the latest user interface changes as they try
to help you.
--
Les Mikesell
lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
