Re: Fedora 11: moving to posix file capabilities?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 3:22 PM, Michael Stone <michael@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Could you please suggest some links to your favorite writeups of those
> reasons?

The PolicyKit docs have some:
http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/PolicyKit/intro-define-problem.html

> Also, do you have data on what effect (if any) this trend has
> on steady-state system memory consumption?

That's a good question - I think with system activation by default
activated mechanisms will stay around, though obviously the kernel can
page them out.  The clock applet mechanism
(http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gnome-panel/trunk/applets/clock/gnome-clock-applet-mechanism.c)
has its own 30-second timeout but it's kind of a hack.  It's something
we should look at addressing - unfortunately just calling exit() after
30 seconds I believe creates race conditions, and to fix it correctly
will need special DBus support.  There was a thread a while ago about
this on the DBus list IIRC.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux