On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 03:22:42PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I know portmapper is special, I think we can fix this by adding a check > if its running (by using the subsys lockfile, cheap) and if not start it, > to all > services using portmap. > > So the nis case would be fixed by the ypbind script starting portmapper > (using service portmapper on) if not already running). Is it the way dependent services should be handled? I don't think that something special should be done for portmap/ypbind/nfs. I thought that the switch to upstart was in part motivated by this kind of feature. Otherwise said, I think that it is wrong to do it in the scripts, it should be done in the boot sequence configuration. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
