Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 17:45 +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
Dmitry Butskoy píše v Út 28. 10. 2008 v 19:17 +0300:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:24 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote:
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:49:33PM +0200, shmuel siegel wrote:
Did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, the code did that
deliberately? Maybe someone thought that it would be a good idea for
usable consoles numbers to start at 1? Or someone thought that once
people started down a certain path with conventions, it shouldn't be
changed unless the people saw a real benefit.
Haven't you heard? If you're not a graphical-only desktop-type single
user working on a laptop, you're not relevant.
Exactly - nothing much to add.
Time to evaluate other distros.
Time to unite "good old community" people...
Count me in :-)
me too :-)
Unfortunately, most 10+ experienced users already have made a career,
hence they have a work, and they are busy. Too busy to start even a SIG
group. Some essential organizational efforts are necessary for obtaining
their participation...
I cannot understand why it is so big trouble to let the old (or better
classic) behaviour be still an option, when somebody decides that his
way is the right way.
Good idea. Have a "single-user/single-seat" vs. ""multiuser" toggle in
the install ;)
Ralf
I think that's much. Theres a 1-liner conf file change to fix it.
--CJD
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
