On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 09:06 -0700, Christopher Stone wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 8:39 AM, Ralf Corsepius <rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > On Tue, 2008-10-28 at 16:24 +0100, Olivier Galibert wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 04:49:33PM +0200, shmuel siegel > wrote: > > > Did you ever think that maybe, just maybe, the code did > that > > > deliberately? Maybe someone thought that it would be a > good idea for > > > usable consoles numbers to start at 1? Or someone thought > that once > > > people started down a certain path with conventions, it > shouldn't be > > > changed unless the people saw a real benefit. > > > > Haven't you heard? If you're not a graphical-only > desktop-type single > > user working on a laptop, you're not relevant. > > Exactly - nothing much to add. > > Time to evaluate other distros. > > > > I can think of better reasons to switch distros other than what tty X > is run on. True, but it's one brick in a lengthy series of stupid and silly decisions, which have been gradually running down Fedora into this single-user windows clone it has evolved into. > Let's keep this thread going, lots of great entertainment value! Right, the "great RH tyrants who are finally showing up!" :) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
