On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 08:19:37PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Okay, but what is the problem? If you want to know what requires > libfoo.so.42 and do "rpm -q --whatrequires libfoo.so.42", why shouldn't > it include "foo-42-13.fc10.i386" in the list if some binary in package > foo is linked against libfoo.so.42? > I'm not saying it isn't mostly redundant, but I don't see what the big > deal is. Is it causing a problem in yum depsolving or something? I imagine it's a speed thing. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxx> Senior Systems Architect Cyberinfrastructure Labs Computing & Information Technology Harvard School of Engineering & Applied Sciences -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
