Re: providing what they require

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Here is a list of pkgs and their requirement that they also provide.

Okay, but what is the problem?  If you want to know what requires
libfoo.so.42 and do "rpm -q --whatrequires libfoo.so.42", why shouldn't
it include "foo-42-13.fc10.i386" in the list if some binary in package
foo is linked against libfoo.so.42?

I'm not saying it isn't mostly redundant, but I don't see what the big
deal is.  Is it causing a problem in yum depsolving or something?
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux