Once upon a time, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > Here is a list of pkgs and their requirement that they also provide. Okay, but what is the problem? If you want to know what requires libfoo.so.42 and do "rpm -q --whatrequires libfoo.so.42", why shouldn't it include "foo-42-13.fc10.i386" in the list if some binary in package foo is linked against libfoo.so.42? I'm not saying it isn't mostly redundant, but I don't see what the big deal is. Is it causing a problem in yum depsolving or something? -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list