Re: directfb version bump (with ABI bump)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, 22 October 2008 at 22:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik <at> greysector.net> writes:
> > I don't see an F-10 branch in pkgdb so I'm assuming you want to break ABI
> > just before a new release. Is there a good reason for this?
> 
> Is there a good reason not to? I could understand the objection if this 
> affected a lot of packages, but there's exactly 1 dependent package in all of 
> Fedora, which isn't even installed by default (it's called -extras for a 
> reason) and which I can take care of rebuilding (I comaintain xine-lib).

I guess I'm objecting out of principle. One shouldn't break ABI a couple of
weeks before final release. However, if you don't mind (being the only one
affected), I won't complain any further.

Regards,
R.

-- 
Fedora http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rathann
RPMFusion http://rpmfusion.org | MPlayer http://mplayerhq.hu
"Faith manages."
        -- Delenn to Lennier in Babylon 5:"Confessions and Lamentations"

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux