Re: directfb version bump (with ABI bump)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik <at> greysector.net> writes:
> I don't see an F-10 branch in pkgdb so I'm assuming you want to break ABI
> just before a new release. Is there a good reason for this?

Is there a good reason not to? I could understand the objection if this 
affected a lot of packages, but there's exactly 1 dependent package in all of 
Fedora, which isn't even installed by default (it's called -extras for a 
reason) and which I can take care of rebuilding (I comaintain xine-lib).

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux