On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 3:33 PM, Les Mikesell <lesmikesell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Matthew Garrett wrote: >> >>>> Local delivery of mail is a poor solution, since it provides no >>>> indication of priority difference between "You've got spam" and "Your hard >>>> drive is failing". >>> >>> That's a solvable problem within the context of email, whereas starting >>> from scratch and re-inventing delivery to arbitrary user-selectable >>> endpoints is somewhat insane. >> >> I'm sure the anti-spam companies would be delighted to hear it. Yes, it's >> a solvable problem - but you're conflating two things, important system >> updates and personal email. I think trying to present these two quite >> different things in the same way is a bad idea. > > I think it is a bad idea for you to decide Let's be clear - this is a meritocracy, not a vote-by-email-repetition system. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
