Re: None of the Above (was Re: Sendmail still default?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 02:17:39PM -0500, Les Mikesell wrote:
> Matthew Garrett wrote:
> >Once you're beyond the typical desktop use case, then yes, an MTA 
> >probably makes sense. But that's not an argument for an MTA in the 
> >default desktop install.
> 
> OK, if you really are so elitist that you think typical users can't 
> figure out how to use standard programs, consider the case where you 
> install the software for one of your incapable friends or family members 
> and you'd like those impending failure warnings to come to you since the 
> user won't understand them anyway.

I'm pretty solidly of the opinion that email is nowhere near being the 
most sensible way to get important information to a typical desktop 
user. If a failure is important then the user needs to know about it as 
soon as possible - mail provides no guarantees about timely delivery. We 
have plenty of desktop infrastructure to give important alerts to users, 
we're just failing to do so.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux