Re: minimum memory requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 11:47 +0300, Aioanei Rares wrote:

>
>         Gah, ignore me. I meant to install i386 earlier but wound up
>         installing
>         an x86_64 image which accounts for the difference. And the
>         docs agree
>         fully with my subsequent experience :)


> Either way, I think you're right...the req's are kinda high...

Well, yes. I will do an i386 install later and compare. I don't really
blame the *x86_64* figures for being so high, largely because any system
featuring an x86_64 probably never had less than 256MB RAM and 512MB
really isn't all that much to be expecting these days. It'd just be
nicer if we could install in a virtual machine with less allocated.

x86_64 requires more disk space/RAM because of the libraries. But it still would be nice if
we could come up with some idea to un-bloat various aspects in Fedora, aspects which
attract a somehow negative image upon the distribution.
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux