Adam Tkac píše v Út 14. 10. 2008 v 22:01 +0200:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying pass tightvnc package through package review but I've been
> informed that I don't meet package naming guidelines.
>
I am doing the review, so I will try to explain.
> Source is pulled from upstream svn so I used this Revision tag and
> .tar.bz2 name:
>
> tightvnc-1.5.0-0.4.svn2975%{?dist}
> tightvnc-1.5.0-svn2975.tar.bz2
>
> Point where source was taken from upstream VCS is absolutely clear -
> it was revision 2975 but packaging guidelines says that I have to use
> date (something like 20081008svn or 20081008svn2975):
20081008svn2975 is preferred here
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages
>
> I think that guidelines should be updated and using of "revision" tag
> should be allowed when upstream uses something like svn.
>
If I remember it correctly from the previous discussions on this theme,
then the main purpose of using date in the revision for svn, git, etc.
is that it is immediately clear how old is the snapshot. And this
information cannot be seen from the revision number or git hash without
asking the version control system first.
Dan
--
Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
