Hi all,
I'm trying pass tightvnc package through package review but I've been
informed that I don't meet package naming guidelines.
Source is pulled from upstream svn so I used this Revision tag and
.tar.bz2 name:
tightvnc-1.5.0-0.4.svn2975%{?dist}
tightvnc-1.5.0-svn2975.tar.bz2
Point where source was taken from upstream VCS is absolutely clear -
it was revision 2975 but packaging guidelines says that I have to use
date (something like 20081008svn or 20081008svn2975):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL#Using_Revision_Control
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#SnapshotPackages
I think that guidelines should be updated and using of "revision" tag
should be allowed when upstream uses something like svn.
Do you have any comments?
Regards, Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
