On Tue October 14 2008, Jon Ciesla wrote: > > On Tue October 14 2008, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> > On Tue October 14 2008, David Woodhouse wrote: > >> >> Maybe a one-line report to FESCo each week, stating the number of > >> >> reviews completed in the past week and the number still outstanding, > >> >> would be perfectly sufficient. It wasn't about _forcing_ people to > >> > > >> > How about updating this weekly: > >> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus > >> > >> Even monthly, if it's a hassle, he said, not knowing how it was > >> generated, > >> and then noticing that he was undercaffienated and self-narrating, fell > >> silent. > > > > Yippie, I believe I finally understood what you were writing. ;-) > > Christian > > Iseli maintained and created it, I asked him via private mail for > > sources. > > Yeah, my English isn't always the best*. Sorry about that. :) To me it looked like poetry ;-). Here are the sources for the reports btw: http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/status-report-scripts/?root=fedora Regards, Till
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
